Japan Grope And Rape On Subway

More Tutorials presentations

How Much To Fix A Tv/dvd

Miguel Hernández Miguel Hernández

Nanas de la cebolla

The onion is frost shut in and poor

. Frost
phone


days and my nights.

Hunger and onion,
black ice and frost


large and round.

hunger in the cradle of

my child was.


onion blood
breastfeeding.

But your blood sugar frosted

,

onion and hunger.

A dark woman

resolved

moon pours

thread by thread into the cradle. Laugh

boy

bring you the moon

when necessary.

Lark of my house,

laugh a lot.

Your laughter in your eyes

light of the world. Laugh so much



my soul to hear

beat in space.

Your laughter frees me,

gives me wings. Solitudes

I removed, I started

prison. Boca

flying,

heart in your mouth

flashes.

Your laugh is the most victorious sword

,


winner of the flowers and the larks


Rival of the sun.


Future of my bones and my love
.


flapping meat,

sudden eyelid,

living like never

colored.

goldfinch much

goes back flaps,

from your body!

woke up to be a child:

never wake up. Sad I

mouth:

always laugh.

always in the crib,



defending laughter feather by feather.

a flight so broad, so widespread

,

that your body is the sky

newborn.


If I could go back to the origin


your career!

the eighth month

laugh with five orange blossoms. With five minute



atrocities. With five teeth



as five teenagers

jasmine.

frontier of kisses

be tomorrow,

when

teeth feel a weapon. Feel


fire
teeth running down the center

looking. Fly
child
double breast

moon:

he thought onion,

you satisfied.

will not collapse.

not know what happens or what happens

.

Remington Precision Mb40 Charger

Centennial Where's Paul?

Well, I found a rather interesting video on Internet security but is a little stronger than is usually publish M ª José and the motto is: 'If you protect yourself in real life why not do it online? "

Exercises For Lower Back Muscles

The lower you upload do not ever


I keep insisting on the trust issue because I know what @ s who are ...
A big hug and luck for this new course. Follow
blog posting that is yours !!!!!!!!

Famous Players Silvercity Biography

Works and Works II

I return to the theme of the previous article and works box. While my original intention with that iconic picture was sufficient to produce a coherent, I soon realized my limitations for this task (let's be John Berger to write essays with images only, as it did in Modes see ) and added references to each of the classifications, and then clarification on some of the works that I put at the end of the article.

Now I think that may be more things that deserve clarification. Then start going into detail.

The first row of the table of literary , that of the work The Iliad, remember something that very well known, it is worth saying again if it comes to thinking work within the Information Science: The Iliad was not written was that . Strictly speaking, the epic poems were sung , just as tragedies, so the picture is not totally accurate at this point and should include the musical aspect of this work. Something that will probably never reach known. But what mattered to me here is that some works do not come into the world as documents, but they become over time, as indicates the second row. It's the same process of traditional stories, songs popular in short, any activity "literary" that comes from a culture that has no writing or does not use it for aesthetic purposes. It is also the case of music, as shown in the front rows of box musicals and performing arts . And go into the details of these paintings. But I want to return to literary works and the issue of modes of reception.

There are two aspects, plus the fact not set (yet) a document, which are closely linked to the mediation. On the one hand the property to require mediation implies that the reception of the work necessarily occurs in a social environment. At least they are needed the mediator and the receiver is not possible individual reception of a work that requires an interpreter. Among many other things, this means that the work must be collected at the time, a common time to all listeners, a time that can not go back or forward.

other hand, not being represented in a document, which is a physical object, there is a physical object that point: the words (and music, dance, performance) is carried by the wind.

The following works do not present any particular with respect to the subject of mediation, are already works, while written works have been designed as documents and therefore all have a physical object that supports the work and all can be accessed individually. The only explanation is that the poems, like The Golem Borges' stories, as The beasts Roberto Arlt and journal articles, such as Howell does not have the physical correlate a book but a part of a book: a series of leaves.

In the last rows down some conclusions on the table of literary works. The first is that any literary work can be retrotraíada to the original state of work performed by the reading public. The poem recited The golem we put back into the place of citizens in the agora and again put the work in time. In this case the document is part of the mediation, but as in The Iliad, the reception of the work is an act and that act does not set a document. For this to happen, as shown in the row is required for audio, and here we are definitely engaged in the bourgeois modernity. If there were no differences from the point of view of reception from the reading of an ancient or medieval manuscript and a modern edition, this restoration of auditory reception of the literary work to the limit coincides with the historical divisions tradicionales. Obviamente, el registro sonoro es mucho más importante a la hora de hablar de las obras musicales, pero esto formará parte de otro post. De todos modos, la caracteristica a destacar desde el lugar en que lo estamos analizando, es que la mediación no es más producida por un humano sino por una máquina, lo que permite que esta obra mediada pueda ser accedida individualmente.

Finalmente, vemos que lo que parecía válido para toda obra literaria, no lo es para el caso ya mencionado de Le Livre de Mallarmé, y podría decirse otro tanto de las obras perdidas, pero mentadas, de Sófocles o Esquilo y de tantas otras. Este detalle que parecería sin importancia, no es menor desde point of view of the Cs of the Documentation, on the one hand it makes no sense to classify a work that set up a document. They are works that may have historic, aesthetic, philosophical or scientific, but are outside the documentation. But on the other hand, while establishing relationships between works (being version, to be adapted, quote, etc) are indeed in the discipline may have these types of relationships between works "normal" and these "works no document", then, paradoxically, are also within the discipline. Should we challenge these boundaries?.

The last row of the table, which is common to all the tables indicates that all work-and we saw that there is no universal understand this literally, can be transcribed into digital media. While the scan extends the range of works that can be represented in documents-perhaps all types of works, from the point of view of the reception is a novelty compared to recording sound.

Night In Paris Streaming

Objects, models, behaviors

long time ago that turns me this sentence from a Article of Hernán Wilkinson Blog:

"To which I want to go and I can hardly yet formally prove is that for me to have a 'good 'model involves having an isomorphism between model objects and the entities of the domain. This means that for each domain entity is a single object that represents "

I leave aside the question of isomorphism with reality , because the issue is best treated roughly especially more from the philosophy that since the computer . However, I believe that this should take the issue of environmental reality, that what you say is worth much if the domain is actually (or part thereof) as if it is not.

A definition of model I spent a long time is very much in tune with Hernan, "A conceptual system (abstract) achieved through representation of isomorphic or homomorphic a particular system, as intellectual construct designed to organize the experience is always partial and provisional, and practically any model is incomplete because it leaves out some properties of the original system, imperfect as the modeling technique introduced due to the support properties model. "François, Charles. Dictionary of General Systems Theory and Cybernetics .

The clarification that the model can be isomorphic or homomorphic is very important, because the isomorphism is symmetric, implying that for every object model , there is a single domain entity which is representation. And this would lead one side to the problem whether entities such as numbers, collections and abstract classes a part of the domain hierarchy. Some would say that the numbers are entities that are part of any domain. And to the extent that the domain is conceived in terms of hierarchy, then the abstract classes are implicit in this hierarchy and that the models in order (if the implementation uses inheritance), which is explicit.

so I would not assert categorically that numbers, sets and other abstractions are part of any domain. I take the example of musical notation, it is clearly a model of music "real." Is an isomorphic representation, as for (almost) every entity in the domain, ie, every note, every instrument, every joint, etc., there is an entity (a chart) in the model. If we had to make a software that models this model is the musical writing, we should look to mathematics as a few times, but you can read music without knowing add. Today I found a phrase from Leibniz in the review of the book Mathematics teacher that illustrates this well: "Music is an unconscious exercise in arithmetic, and that comes with it knows that handles numbers." The numbers are only necessary when for some reason you have to leave that state of "ignorance" for some purpose, how to understand certain laws, certain regularities. Software, for example, must translate the writing musical notes, you must know what is the twelfth root of two, a musician does not need this knowledge to know that two spots in two different positions on paper signify that you have to move a finger from one place to another.

Yes, you can always insist implicit relations. I prefer to think that rather than take something that is there, what we do is put something that is in us: to interpret.

In this case, both large abstractions, abstract classes, together with the emerging deployment needs only and all the paraphernalia of objects may have a program, would be covered in this "semantic gap" mentioned in the definition of systems theory. Are all "property due to the support model."

homomorphism In this case the model is rather a kind of utopia, wishful thinking, a desire for something more precise accuracy. But then it would not be expressed formally.

Another issue I think we have to consider is that many times, perhaps the majority, which is modeled is itself a model. If we take some of the classic examples of the kinds of programming and design of systems such as bank accounts, or book loan schemes, it is clear that these systems and are themselves a model. There is no single savings accounts relating to customers, there is a model designed for money to flow according to certain rules. The problem is that is naturalized, reified, (it is considered a given reality) rather than actually built a (model). It seems pretty clear that the "realities" to model has different degrees of abstraction, or if like, different distances from noumenal reality. These computer models would then "meta" levels with varying amounts of "meta." Sure, there will

ejemplos de modelos informátios que no modelan otros modelos. Tal vez sea el caso de los sistemas de simulación, que si bien pueden incluir partes que son metamodelos, el sistema total no lo es, porque lo que se aspira es que el modelo conceptual surga de algún modo de la simulación.

Revisando los usos de la palabra "modelo" encuentro que en la gran mayoría de los casos se trata de modelos teóricos; como dice la definición, sistemas abstractos que representan sistemas concretos. Excepto  los " Toy models " o los modelos del aeromodelismo o similares, los únicos modelos que además de representar algo, hacen algo, son los modelos computacionales. El modelo atómico does what the atom, or make anything, just looking to represent. To understand, to teach. Instead the software is to model other models is that models of reality, models always doing something. Of course, this model can also be used to understand or to teach, but what is that never fails to .

I think this emphasis on making is the key to understanding how it differs from the paradigm of other objects, which reduced to mathematical or logical abstractions whatever you want to model, while objects are modeled from the tool itself, which is the do . For modeling a do is nothing to model behaviors . One way to insist that objects that are defined by their behavior, and boldly said in the previous article r. I have no theoretical tools to address these concepts in depth, I do not know if any. But I do know that in many other areas of emphasis in practice this is quite recent. I think for example in Roger Chartier, who has long studied the history of books, publishing, construction, not the traditional way, as the study of techniques and ideas, but as a practical study. Instead of the history of the work raises the History of Reading. This is worth at least as evidence that the object paradigm is in keeping with the spirit of the times.

Back then the problem of principle could say that a good model (object) is a model in which there is a homomorphism between the behavior of the entities of the domain and the behavior of objects. The difference in this definition is that now is not necessary correspondence between institutions but between behaviors. Two or more objects can do what a domain entity, object behaviors can subsume several entities of the domain. A good knife of Occam to avoid considering the abstractions that we created as part of a domain that did not know, o recíprocamente, evitar incoporar al diseño objetos que representan entidades que sólo tiene distintos nombres, pero que se comportan del mismo modo.

Todo esto dicho también en forma osada y sujeto a revisión.

Nipple Piercing Extender

Chapter 6: Revenge, a dish best served cold (Final)

Panenyas Harpies and in constant warfare for centuries and were very enemies, but obviously this war would end with these constant fights, but there was a problem: Only 300 were 150 Panenyas against harpies and we had to give life to Roule they swallow the earth, will we get?

- Harpies, attack! - Shouted one of them
- Panenyas, Disperse! Hackett, come with me! - Said a
Panenya
Roule We go where he was almost buried.
-Hackett .. What happened to Mudafa?
"Please .. Not to mention that
-Haha, do not worry, everything will go well, knew what he was doing Mudafa
"If I could have done he would be here .. And surely you would not be at war and not Would not be buried Roule .. - Answered sad
- Yes it would! Can not you see you're the only one who can do that? In addition, we have to release
out!
"But your just ..
"I do not run out of power, it is important to save your friend

began to recite and I started to take branches and branches to remove all but there was no Roule ..

- What happened? - I was beginning to drop a little tear
"We've done well, do not understand anything .. -
replied "No way .. Can not be true! I hate you! We should have done it long before they sink into the earth .. - I cry
-Cof, cof God Yuck! Take my land is off and you're watching me and one crying and complaining the other, the ladies are not doing that! - Shouted
Roule - Roule! You're alive!
"No, I'm tired of your antics but I am ..

ran towards her and threw me over his crying and planted a kiss on the lips.
- Agg, slobbering away, now I have to wash your face with steel wool! This has not gone eh? -
Roule said "It's that .. - I
"But from the moment you loved me and that I knew until the pointer, my son -" Well protested
Roule Roule .. think what you want, but now we have to help prevent the harpies wrecking everything .. - Said changing the subject
"Look .. Okay, now what? - Asked (...)



Harpies had already beaten many Panenyas Panenyas and had halved the harpies, but that was not enough, it was very difficult to beat. They were infected claws that could end the life of a person.
Roule and the only thing I could do was throw stones with slingshots and little else.

-Hackett, look what I found - said whispering
- A claw ..!
- But shut up fool! Can not you see we're going to hear? Listen, when and harpies are few use it to eliminate


-Vale had already spent a few hours and many Panenyas lay on the ground, the scene was eerie, as the harpies if they died instantly vanished and there appeared to have Panenyas fought only.
Panenya was no longer standing and only two shrews were resisting the attack Panenyas.

"Well, the time has come, we must attack .. - Whispered
- Come!

Harpies thinking that there was no one and helped by his bad hearing, did not realize that we attacked.
I dug my fingernail one and the other realized that we were.

-Jajajajajajajajaja, insolent children, to bring our own weapons to hurt us - one of them said "Yeah ..
Is that .. Children today are mental short - was followed by the phrase

against us was thrown when a Panenya came from behind and sent them out of orbit.

"But if you are .. Mufasa!
-Boy .. If you did, but it almost did not count -
sadder voice said "So you let down?
"Yes, but what I told you, began to fly and she alone was given to a branch and broke the very silly
- What are you talking? - Asked Roule
"It's a long story ..

I suddenly started to float and fell a kind of glitter.
-Hackett, this is not Saturday Night Fever, low rope
- "Where the hooked noses in the middle of nowhere? - Asked
"Well ..
- Basta! Mufasa-Hackett interrupted, your mission in this world is over, you just need the last step ..

Suddenly, the trees and plants grew well, around us and all the three bodies Panenya.
-Hackett will have to choose between your life or that of all these Panenyas and your people .. End




If you're I've been reading stunned to know that history has no end, because the most important story is that you tell, the images and change all that tells the story.
I must say that there will be a continuation and that you, the readers, imaginéis the way to your liking.
And finally, I say that I have another ace up his sleeve, as I did with it, I'll give only the title

And yes, it is a tribute to the day of all Saints, also known as Halloween.

36 Weeks Pregnant And Have Infection In My Tooth

About the name "Object" Building and Construction I

Hace unos años, creo que ahora ya no es más asi, pero tal vez me equivoque, en las clases de introducción a objetos se daba una metodología para aplicar al diseño con objetos que consistía en lo siguiente: a partir de los requerimientos de un determinado sistema, se debían subrayar los sustantivos; con toda seguridad, se afirmaba, éstos terminarán siendo las clases del system. In contrast, the verbs were going to give at least an idea of \u200b\u200bthe expected behavior of the resulting objects of those classes. It was obviously a method copied from entity relationship classes.
The vulgata computer, when to refer to objects, icons often used three-dimensional objects, which not only increases the confusion that the polysemy of the term implies, it is one thing an object in the sense of something something material, tangible, spatial dimensions, and quite another to a computational object.
Similarly, on many platforms in which we talk about objects, they also get confused with things. In HTML, for example, objects are inserted that are not nothing but files, the equivalent of the thing in the digital world.
This has led many to believe that objects are something like the Aristotelian substance brought to the digital world, ie that the model objects have to think in terms of entities or substances that are defined by their properties. To model objects means finding things and wonder what they are, what defines them, what properties they have. property is what is proper that defines the object would be something in himself.
The word order does not help try to clear up this misunderstanding, but reading any good code written with objects reveals that what is shaping are not things.
A computer object is defined in terms of behavior. When working with objects not matter so much what they are, or what purport to be or represent, but rather how they behave, how they interact with other objects. Understand the meaning of an object when we understand their behavior. Are decisions related to the behavior that makes us a deeper analysis and finding areas not covered, by their particular behaviors that deserve a special place. An object would then be a "pipeline", ie something that is defined by its behavior. As each message would be a "behavioreme" low expression "behavior." If the proposition is ideal that each perform a single action message, each message is then to atomic behavior, behavior that can not be broken in others.
This is the reason why programmers aims to change the class names, message names, the names of the arguments, because as we understand better that makes an object, only then start to understand and therefore as naming it.

If the objects are units of behavior, it is not referential function of language which is more useful to us. To understand the functioning of a given domain in terms of behavior, not in terms of what "is" is more useful to the story. Objects are units of behavior in a narrative, but a complete story, a narrative account of everything that happens and what can happen.

But the name "object" not so bad.
An object is observed, manipulated, known as a subject. The object paradigm thus show one end of the chain of knowledge: an object that is observed by a subject. Delete the subject, think in terms of objects that must be found and that have properties to be discovered, is to believe that there is a being that is already defined, a being that is identical to itself. But since this is not of being but of doing, that is, to see what objects are, the subject is paramount, because this see the behavior of objects is necessarily subjective . It is not disclosing a given reality but to build a new reality in which objects are defined by what the subject wants to do, or put another way, a model built on the basis of what the subject interprets objects do in reality.
The misconception is that a system with objects is an objective representation.

Catch Phrases Of Moon

Librarians and programmers have a common obsession objects to the classification. Then this blog is dedicated to waterway between the two worlds, begins with a classification.

One of the first ways of approaching the study of the issues raised regarding the FRBR work is surrounded by a few works and try to set up classes. This led me to make a box works in which I tried to establish what are the lessons that these works belong. The table has been growing and now are actually several. The criteria for this classification are temporary and subjective, while taking into account many other existing classifications, such as document types Martha Yee and Tom Delsey. The idea is to be deployed through them the complexity of the problem in ways that serve to induce more reflections and reconsiderations that affirm positive knowledge. Spine References seek to clarify the scope of each classification.

Some works merit clarification: Le Livre Mallarmé is a project that never materialized. Umberto Eco presents it in Open Work: "In the Livre , these pages should not have been to follow a fixed order; should have been relatable in different orders according to laws of permutation. Taking a series of separate booklets (not together by a binder that determine suceción), the first and last page of an issue should have been written on a single large sheet folded in two to mark the beginning and the end of the issue, in interior, would play single sheets, simple, mobile, interchangeable, but so that, in any order placed, the discus possessed a complete sense. "The revolutionary idea took shape, if I mistake not, just to Rayuela Julio Cortázar.

4 '33'' is a work of John Cage consisting of 4 minutes and thirty three seconds of silence. The interpretation of this work is a pianist who is turning the leaves of the score, but without producing any sound, because the score is only silence.

The Voynich Manuscript is a medieval manuscript apparently written in a coded language and a profusion of illustrations that could not even be deciphered.
I think the other examples are well known.